Size: 1217
Comment:
|
Size: 1264
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 12: | Line 12: |
'''Important:''' Test cases provided in the TIP '''must''' be implemented. If you program in Java or C++, your program must at least compile, i.e., ''ant compile'' resp. ''make compile'' must succeed. It's otherwise quite a pain for your tutor to look at your code and to find any mistakes (that is your job!). Otherwise, your submission will not be graded (0 points). |
'''Important:''' Test cases provided in the TIP '''must''' be implemented (the content of the test cases is important, not the exact syntax). If you program in Java or C++, your program must at least compile, i.e., ''ant compile'' resp. ''make compile'' must succeed. It's otherwise quite a pain for your tutor to look at your code and to find any mistakes (that is your job!). Otherwise, your submission will not be graded (you will get 0 points). |
Line 15: | Line 16: |
== Für Theorieaufgaben (Beweise) == | == For theoretical tasks (proofs) == |
Line 18: | Line 19: |
Grundidee / Ansatz: 40% Ordentlich ausgearbeitet: 60% |
Basic idea / approach: 40% Line of argument: 60% |
Line 22: | Line 23: |
'''Beispiel:''' Es steht nur eine vage formulierte Beweisidee da. Wenn die auch noch falsch ist, gibt es gar keine Punkte. Wenn die Idee stimmt, gibt's immerhin 2 von 5 Punkten. | '''Example:''' If you only write down the basic, correct proof idea in some vague sentences, you will get only 40% of the points. However, if your proof idea is wrong, you will get 0 points. |
Line 24: | Line 25: |
'''Wichtig:''' Für Fehler in dem einen oder anderen Detail des Beweises gibt es keinen Punktabzug. Es sollte aber schon ersichtlich sein, dass Sie sich Mühe gegeben haben, den Beweis korrekt und vollständig zu führen. | '''Important:''' Minor mistakes in your proof are ok and don't lead to any points deduction. But it should be obvious, that you have made some reasonable effort to show the proof. |
Points scheme for the exercises
For programming tasks (code)
Functionality: 60% Tests: 20% Documentation, Checkstyle, etc.: 20%
Example: If your program works, but there are a couple of checkstyle errors and you don't provide any tests and documentation, you will get only 60% of the points.
Important: Test cases provided in the TIP must be implemented (the content of the test cases is important, not the exact syntax). If you program in Java or C++, your program must at least compile, i.e., ant compile resp. make compile must succeed. It's otherwise quite a pain for your tutor to look at your code and to find any mistakes (that is your job!). Otherwise, your submission will not be graded (you will get 0 points).
For theoretical tasks (proofs)
Basic idea / approach: 40% Line of argument: 60%
Example: If you only write down the basic, correct proof idea in some vague sentences, you will get only 40% of the points. However, if your proof idea is wrong, you will get 0 points.
Important: Minor mistakes in your proof are ok and don't lead to any points deduction. But it should be obvious, that you have made some reasonable effort to show the proof.