1156
Comment:
|
3527
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
Line 6: | Line 5: |
Along with the PDF of your solutions and your source code, please also provide the following two figures, so that all can see them: the maximal time difference you measured between (1) and (2) for Exercise 1, the best speed-up you get from using compression for Exercise 4 (next to last column), and the programming language you used (last column). ||'''No.''' ||'''Name''' ||'''Solution (PDF)''' ||'''Code (ZIP or TGZ)''' ||'''Factor for Ex. 1''' ||'''Speed-up for Ex. 4''' ||'''Progr. Language''' || ||1 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/BjörnBuchholdExercises|Björn Buchhold]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/BjörnBuchholdExercises/björn_buchhold_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/BjörnBuchholdExercises/björn_buchhold_ex4.zip|ZIP]] ||sequential access better by roughly factor 1.7 see pdf for details ||compression better by factor ~5.3 (comparing reading vs reading + decompression) ||Java || ||2 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/RichardZahoranskyExercises|Richard Zahoransky]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/RichardZahoranskyExercises/Richard_Zahoransky_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/RichardZahoranskyExercises/Richard_Zahoransky_ex4.zip|ZIP]] ||sequential access better by factor of 37 ||--- ||Java || ||3 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/FlorianBaeurleExercises|Florian Bäurle]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/FlorianBaeurleExercises/florian_baeurle_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/FlorianBaeurleExercises/florian_baeurle_ex4.zip|ZIP]] ||max. time difference: ~189,14 ms -> seq. access better by factor ~1,8 ||compression better by factor ~9 (depends heavily on m and n) ||C# || ||4 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/MirkoBrodesserExercises|Mirko Brodesser]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/MirkoBrodesserExercises/mirko_brodesser_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/MirkoBrodesserExercises/mirko_brodesser_ex4.zip|ZIP]] ||seq. access better by factor ~14 ||compression better by factor ~2 ||Java || ||5 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/EricLacherExercises|Eric Lacher]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/EricLacherExercises/Eric_Lacher_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/EricLacherExercises/Eric_Lacher_ex4.zip|ZIP]] ||seq. access better by factor ~2 to 70, depends on increment value (see pdf) ||- ||Java || ||6 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/ThomasLiebetrautExercises|Thomas Liebetraut]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/ThomasLiebetrautExercises/thomas_liebetraut_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/ThomasLiebetrautExercises/thomas_liebetraut_ex4.tgz|tgz]] ||seq. access better by factor ~2 ||- ||Python || ||7 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/JonasKrischExercises|Jonas Krisch]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/JonasKrischExercises/jonas_krisch_ex1.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/JonasKrischExercises/jonas_krisch_ex4.zip|ZIP]] ||- ||- ||Java || ||8 ||[[Triatmoko]] ||[[attachment:Triatmoko_Exe4.pdf|Pdf]] ||[[attachment:Triatmoko_exe4.rar|Rar]] ||- ||- ||Borland Delphi 7 || ||9 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/MatthiasSauerExercises|Matthias Sauer]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/MatthiasSauerExercises/matthias_sauer_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/MatthiasSauerExercises/mathtias_sauer_ex4.zip|ZIP]] ||seq. access better by factor ~15 ||compression worse by factor ~2 ||C# || |
|
Line 7: | Line 17: |
Along with the PDF of your solutions and your source code, please also provide the following two figures, so that all can see them: the maximal time difference you measured between (1) and (2) for Exercise 1, the best speed-up you get from using compression for Exercise 4 (next to last column), and the programming language you used (last column). | |
Line 9: | Line 18: |
||'''No.''' ||'''Name''' ||'''Solution (PDF)''' ||'''Code (ZIP or TGZ)''' || '''Factor for Ex. 1''' || '''Speed-up for Ex. 4''' || '''Progr. Language''' || ||1 ||[[SearchEnginesWS0910/BjörnBuchholdExercises|Björn Buchhold]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/BjörnBuchholdExercises/björn_buchhold_ex4.pdf|PDF]] ||[[attachment:SearchEnginesWS0910/BjörnBuchholdExercises/björn_buchhold_ex4.zip|ZIP]] || sequentiel access better by roughly factor 1.8 see pdf for details || compression better by factor ~5.3 (comparing times until int[] is recieved)|| Java || |
Exercise Sheet 4
The rules for uploading are the same as always. If you forgot them, you can read them again here.
Your solutions (files can only be read by the uploader and by us)
Along with the PDF of your solutions and your source code, please also provide the following two figures, so that all can see them: the maximal time difference you measured between (1) and (2) for Exercise 1, the best speed-up you get from using compression for Exercise 4 (next to last column), and the programming language you used (last column).
No. |
Name |
Solution (PDF) |
Code (ZIP or TGZ) |
Factor for Ex. 1 |
Speed-up for Ex. 4 |
Progr. Language |
1 |
sequential access better by roughly factor 1.7 see pdf for details |
compression better by factor ~5.3 (comparing reading vs reading + decompression) |
Java |
|||
2 |
sequential access better by factor of 37 |
--- |
Java |
|||
3 |
max. time difference: ~189,14 ms -> seq. access better by factor ~1,8 |
compression better by factor ~9 (depends heavily on m and n) |
C# |
|||
4 |
seq. access better by factor ~14 |
compression better by factor ~2 |
Java |
|||
5 |
seq. access better by factor ~2 to 70, depends on increment value (see pdf) |
- |
Java |
|||
6 |
seq. access better by factor ~2 |
- |
Python |
|||
7 |
- |
- |
Java |
|||
8 |
- |
- |
Borland Delphi 7 |
|||
9 |
seq. access better by factor ~15 |
compression worse by factor ~2 |
C# |